It
now emerges, via the new book One Nation
Under God by Princeton history professor Kevin Kruse, that it was in response to the New Deal that American
Christians began selling as godly the every-man-for-himself worldview of The
Right. Big Business, hating the idea of the little
guy getting a fair shake, hating even more the idea that their own obscene wealth might be attenuated, enlisted such ordained scumbags as the Rev. James
Fifield, pastor to Hollywood stars, the glamorous and wealthy, to convince the
staunchly moronic American electorate that it was actually Satan behind the
idea of the government intervening on behalf of the poor and old and weak.
Never mind that two major planks in Jesus’s platform had been compassion
and charity — not the tax exemption kind. According to Rev.
Fifield, it behooved the discerning Christian to read the Bible as he or she
would eat fish — to enjoy the delicious flesh after having discarded the bones.
“It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone
who is rich to enter the kingdom of God,” one learned in Mark 10:25. A bone! Proverbs 19:17 taught that "whoever is generous to
the poor lends to the Lord, and he will repay him for his deed." Another bone! Matthew 5:42 urged the faithful to "give
to the one who begs from you." Was there no
end to the bones in this salmon? “Whatever you did for one of the least of these
brothers and sisters of mine,” Matthew 25:40 cautioned, “you did for [Jesus].” Oh, the boniness! The infernal boniness! One was almost content to give up on fishes, and change his order to loaves!
In the course of explaining how to save American democracy yesterday, I suggested that political candidates be hooked up during televised
debates to lie-detecting apparatuses that would administer a mild electric
shock if they lied. I acknowledge that it would be woefully immoderate to advocate the public crucifixions of purportedly Christian
politicians who live in mansions while others are eating out of supermarket
dumpsters and sleeping on the sidewalk. I instead support their being
made to wear crowns of thorns — the awful tight-fitting, Mel Gibson kind, that
which induces lovely cinematic rivulets of blood down the sides of the face.
In terms of the eye of the needle, I would require Christian (and other!)
candidates for national office take an oath of poverty, whereby they would agree
to live while in office on what someone subsisting at around the 33rd
percentile in their districts lived on. My intuition is that most pols are vainglorious
enough to be content with fame and power, and, in some cases, the slim prospect
that their names will go down in history. On leaving office, they can always write
(or have ghostwritten) their memoirs for generous advances.
Speaking of politicians, can someone explain to me why the lame-duck ones
don’t cut the proverbial crap and speak actual truth during their last months
in office? I get that the Democratic National Committee would be apoplectic if
Barack Obama treated himself to an orgy of candor, but when are we going to get
such candor if not in a pol’s lame-duck period?
No comments:
Post a Comment