[From my 2002 song "I Apologize”: No one departs with heart unshattered when something once so precious dies.]
Name Withheld and I met 45 years ago. Tripping
on mescaline, if memory serves, I was awed by his physical beauty. When it
emerged that he played a musical instrument, it occurred to me that if we were in a band
together, maybe I would be able to seduce a few of the girlies for whom he
couldn’t find the time. (Thirteen years later, I married one of his many former short-term girlfriends.) Later that evening, we and our respective gals
drove together to a screening of Fantasia, a movie traditionally much enjoyed
by persons tripping on mescaline. I remarked to my girlfriend, beside me in the
front seat, on The Who’s use of a particular brand of amplifier. NW, in the
back seat, set the record straight with scorching, censorious umbrage, as
though I hadn’t misidentified The Who’s amplification, but called his sister a
slut. I was duly embarrassed, thought to myself, “Gosh, what a jerk,” and
decided maybe the band idea wasn’t so hot after all. But when I encountered him
by chance several days later, he was cordiality itself, and we went on to
perform together for three years, and to be good friends for nearly 20.
No friendship’s without glitches, and glitches were us. On one memorable occasion, when I suggested we go out for a bit of
skirt-chasing, he affirmed the idea — with the understanding that he reserved
the right to cancel if he received a better offer. On another occasion, I’d
talked a record company into financing the recording of some of my new songs. When
he heard that I was going to be working with a producer of our mutual
acquaintance, NW volunteered to play. I’d already recruited a full complement
of musicians, but didn’t want to hurt his feelings. He played poorly and,
at one point in the session, loudly groused, in our mutual acquaintance’s
hearing, “When are we going to do the good
song?” The implication being that his talents were being squandered on three of
the four original songs I’d brought in. His penchant for trying to humiliate me
in the eyes of others, in other words, was undiminished.
He speculated at one
point that he might subconsciously see me as the brilliant older brother to
whom he’d spent his formative years being unfavorably compared. His childhood had
been no more my fault than mine had been his.
In nearly 20 additional years of
estrangement, there arose this thing called the Internet, by use of which one
could try to track down persons from his past. I tracked down and contacted NW,
whom I’d unsuccessfully begged not to abandon our friendship in the first
place, and suggested we attempt restoration. He wouldn’t consider it until I’d
jumped through a few hoops, though. “What,” he wondered icily, “do you think a
friendship is?” I knew that there was no correct answer, that he was just
setting me up to chastise for having failed to live up to his expectations. I
emphatically declined the hoop-jumping, but his heart eventually softened, which
softening he signaled by begrudgingly granting me the privilege of designing
advertising materials for him at no charge. We took to talking on Skype a lot.
A couple of years later, as an American expatriate in England, I became fatally
tired of feeling a stranger in a strange land and resolved to return to where I feel most at home in the world — southern
California, which NW had never left. When I had broken up with my second major
adult girlfriend in 1980, he’d generously invited me to stay with him at the
house he was housesitting, and we’d gotten along fine, so I suggested we share
an apartment. Doing so turned out to be a disaster. In the intervening 32
years, NW turned out to have developed a raft of compulsions. Germs, he seemed
to believe, were not only everywhere, but intent on infecting him! Need proof?
Well, here was an article from the Internet! He was pretty
sure that if we didn’t keep the door locked, evildoers might, even if we were
both home, burst into the apartment and steal either his large collection of seldom-touched
guitars, or the even larger collection of severely mismatched wooden furniture
he’d acquired over the years.
The happy couple in 1971. |
We hadn’t been roommates two weeks when,
without provocation, he invoked an incident from around 1971 in which he
believed me to have improperly handled some financial transaction involving
both of us. “Do you not realize,” I said, shocked and dismayed, “that when you
do this, you’re effectively kicking the chair out from under our friendship?”
Well, of course he didn’t. While thinking of himself as the soul of forgiveness
and charity, he lovingly nurtures his every ancient grievance. Why was I unable to understand that his invocation
of a long-forgotten-by-me incident from 42 years before was unimpeachably
reasonable!
It hasn’t failed to occur to me that those
things we find most insufferable about each other may be those we like
least about ourselves. The difference being, I think, that I’m painfully aware
of my own myriad imperfections. While NW may be aware of his own, deep down, he literally
can’t bear for another to point
them out. The slightest criticism invariably elicits a spirited counterattack.
If, for instance, one plays a recording of him singing terribly out of tune, his
reflexive reaction will be a four-year-old’s —something along the lines of,
“Well, you sing worse!”
His appetite for embarrassing me in front
of third parties remained unsated.. He invited a musician friend over. In the
course of chatting with said friend about my own music, I acknowledged that I’m
a terrible guitarist. “And a terrible singer too,” NW eagerly noted, unprovoked.
Later, when I told him how embarrassed I’d been by the remark, he professed incredulity
at my inability to take a joke. Getting him to “I apologize” had always been
a remarkably exhausting undertaking. Contrition doesn’t come easily to one who can’t bear the thought of having behaved imperfectly.
I am a chronic depressive. We had many
conversations over the years about what he, not understanding depression, sees
as my disinclination (as opposed to inability) to opt for joy over despair. He
proudly points out that he consciously makes that decision on a regular basis.
Thus, I am to understand that he is able to consciously choose joyfulness, but
unable to choose not to be plunged into emotional disrepair by my leaving a
kitchen drawe or cabinet — or maybe even two! — open. I began to understand that he derives considerable joy
from scolding. I, unfortunately, derive none whatever from being scolded.
Using the same wholesome, self-admiring
tone in which he spoke of his choice of joy over despair, he spoke also of how,
unlike me, he always assumed that his friends wished the best for him. Which
sounded just lovely, and wasn’t remotely the case. If, on the way into the
kitchen, I gave his big toe an affectionate squeeze during one of his Tuesday
evening CSI-fests, I had to be
mocking him, just as when I would ask on Tuesday afternoons if he were excited
about his favorite crime dramas coming on later.
The friendship was nonetheless precious to
me. There is no question that he can be wonderfully kind and generous. But I
began to feel as though living with an alcoholic parent — inexpressibly sweet
one moment, and a nightmare the next. I come to live in dread of his sarcasm
and censure. It reached the point at which I explicitly encouraged his cutting
back on the kindness and generosity if it meant he’d stop nagging and do
something about his compulsion to try to humiliate me in front of third parties. No sale.
Because one doesn’t prevail in an argument
with him, not ever, and because I’d repeatedly expressed as clearly as it’s in
me to express anything how intolerable I found his nagging, sarcasm, and
compulsion to embarrass me, I regretfully reached the point at which, to
protect myself, I avoided any interaction with him.
He lost a parent (I’m presuming) a few weeks ago.
I offered my condolences, and expressed my regret about the death of our
friendship. He mocked me on both counts, and ferociously decried my insensitivity in mentioning
the two things together. If the friendship was dead, he asserted, with no little viciousness, it was because I'd lied four years before when I'd told him I'd do my utmost to make it work. He had played no part whatever!
It was unmistakable that the point of no return was now several miles behind us. The person I'd loved so long, if interruptedly, as a friend, looked to me now like nothing but a grade-A prick.
It was unmistakable that the point of no return was now several miles behind us. The person I'd loved so long, if interruptedly, as a friend, looked to me now like nothing but a grade-A prick.
No comments:
Post a Comment